Background orchestration is the default orchestration model for oh-my-opencode-slim. It assumes native OpenCode background subagents are available and changes the orchestrator from a primary worker into a scheduler.
The old model was:
orchestrator works directly → delegates when useful → waits for result
The default background-orchestration model is:
orchestrator plans → dispatches background specialists → monitors → reconciles → verifies
This is a clean rebuild, not a compatibility layer over the old blocking model.
Background orchestration requires an OpenCode release that includes native background subagents, launched with background subagents enabled:
OPENCODE_EXPERIMENTAL_BACKGROUND_SUBAGENTS=true opencode
The required native/background-control tools are:
| Tool | Purpose |
|---|---|
task(..., background: true) |
Start a specialist in the background and immediately return a task ID |
| hook-driven completion | OpenCode injects terminal background task results automatically |
cancel_task |
Plugin-provided tool to cancel a tracked background task by task ID or Background Job Board alias |
If these are not available, the scheduler cannot use the default background workflow. Configure the environment variable through the installer or use the one-shot export above before starting OpenCode.
Use an OpenCode release that includes native background subagents and hook-driven completion; run opencode --version and update if background tasks are missing.
The orchestrator is not the default implementation worker.
Its job is to:
Specialists do the work. The orchestrator manages the work.
Every non-trivial request follows this loop:
Understand
↓
Plan dependency graph
↓
Dispatch independent specialists in background
↓
Track task IDs and ownership
↓
Continue only independent coordination work
↓
Wait for hook-driven completion
↓
Reconcile results and resolve conflicts
↓
Dispatch follow-up work if needed
↓
Verify
↓
Final response
The orchestrator should not act on assumptions from a still-running task. It can continue scheduling independent work, but dependent work waits for terminal task results.
Before dispatching agents, the orchestrator identifies:
This does not need to be a long plan. It should be just enough structure to avoid wasted work and conflicting edits.
Independent work should be launched with background tasks:
task(
description="Search auth flow",
subagent_type="explorer",
background=true,
prompt="Find the auth entry points, session storage, and login callback paths. Return file paths and a concise map. Do not edit files."
)
The orchestrator records the returned task ID and keeps working only on safe, independent coordination.
The scheduler must prevent write conflicts.
Rules:
fixer tasks against overlapping folders unless ownership is
explicit.Background tasks are not complete until OpenCode injects their terminal result or hook-driven completion marks them terminal.
The orchestrator should use background completion events to:
The orchestrator should use cancel_task only when the user asks, or when a
running lane is obsolete, wrong, or conflicts with a safer replacement plan.
Cancellation is not rollback: if cancelling a writer, inspect and reconcile
partial file changes before launching a replacement lane.
Note on reconciliation: Idle-based reconciliation is a heuristic. A job marked as reconciled means its terminal result was injected into an orchestrator turn that completed and the parent returned to idle; it is not proof the result was explicitly acknowledged or used. The orchestrator should still verify it consumed the relevant outputs before finalizing.
Specialist outputs are inputs, not final truth. The orchestrator reconciles them against each other and the original user goal.
Verification remains orchestrator-owned, but not necessarily orchestrator-run.
Examples:
designer,oracle,fixer,The final response should only happen after relevant background work is terminal and reconciled.
Read-only reconnaissance and codebase mapping. Usually the first background task for unfamiliar work.
External docs, version-specific API behavior, and real-world examples. Runs in parallel with Explorer when implementation depends on current library behavior.
Bounded implementation worker. Receives a clear objective, file ownership, constraints, and validation expectations.
User-facing UI/UX implementation and review. Owns visual polish, responsive layout, interaction quality, and design consistency.
Architecture, code review, simplification, risk analysis, and high-stakes debugging. Often used after implementation or before risky refactors.
Multi-model decision support for critical trade-offs. It is not a worker pool; it is for judgment where disagreement is useful.
Visual/media analysis isolated from the orchestrator context.
Background orchestration removes the orchestrator-as-worker default.
The orchestrator may directly:
The orchestrator should delegate:
This keeps the main context focused on coordination instead of filling it with worker detail.
Every delegated task should be self-contained.
Include:
Good background task prompt:
Investigate src/hooks/task-session-manager for assumptions that a task tool
result means the child task has finished. Do not edit files. Return:
1. exact files/functions involved,
2. which assumptions break with background tasks,
3. recommended code changes,
4. tests that should be added.
Bad background task prompt:
Look into background tasks.
The prompt/runtime treats background tasks as a small job board:
| Field | Meaning |
|---|---|
| task ID | Native OpenCode background task/session ID |
| specialist | Agent type assigned |
| objective | What the task is responsible for |
| state | running, completed, error, cancelled, timed out |
| ownership | Files/folders/subsystems the task may edit |
| dependencies | Tasks that must complete first |
| result | Final task output once terminal |
The current todo list can represent user-visible work, but task IDs and file ownership need to be explicit in the orchestrator's working context.
The plugin is aware that a task return can mean "background job launched"
rather than "work complete". It tracks running task IDs, exposes recent work in
the background job board, updates aliases from task results, and keeps
multiplexer panes attached while the parent orchestrator continues scheduling.
The installer and docs configure background subagents as a requirement for the default scheduler workflow. If background subagents are unavailable, treat it as an environment or OpenCode-version issue rather than an intentional V1 fallback:
Background orchestration requires OpenCode background subagents.
Start OpenCode with:
OPENCODE_EXPERIMENTAL_BACKGROUND_SUBAGENTS=true opencode
No automatic legacy fallback keeps the mental model clean.
User asks:
Make background subagents first-class in this plugin.
The orchestrator should do something like:
At no point does the orchestrator become the main implementer.
Background orchestration is working when:
Background orchestration is not just "parallel agents." It is a scheduler-centered operating model for OpenCode's native background subagents.